Prental Cardiac Screening and Postnatal Major Congenital Heart Defect Prevalence

Key Points

Question 
Is centralized prenatal cardiac screening associated with the postnatal prevalence of congenital heart defects (CHD), and was postnatal prevalence affected by the introduction of the first trimester screening?

Findings 
In this cross-sectional study of more than 3.3 million children, the combined prenatal and postnatal incidence of major CHDs remained unchanged over the 3 decades studied. The introduction of first trimester screening resulted in a higher termination of pregnancy (TOP) rate of fetuses with univentricular heart and those with associated comorbidities at an early stage but did not revert the overall decreasing trend in TOP.

Meaning 
In this study, the TOP rate decreased significantly for cardiac anomalies with favorable outcome and has become uncommon in recent years.

Importance 
Prenatal cardiac screening of the first and second trimesters has had a major impact on postnatal prevalence of congenital heart defects (CHDs), rates of termination of pregnancy (TOP), and outcomes among children born alive with CHDs.

Objective 
To examine the prenatal and postnatal incidence of major CHDs (ie, necessitating intervention within the first year of life), detection rate trends, rates of TOP, and the association of cardiac screening with postnatal outcomes.

Design, Settings, and Participants 
In this cross-sectional study, 3827 fetuses with antenatally diagnosed major CHDs in the Czech Republic (population 10.7 million) between 1991 and 2021 were prospectively evaluated with known outcomes and associated comorbidities. Prenatal and postnatal prevalence of CHD in an unselected population was assessed by comparison with a retrospective analysis of all children born alive with major CHDs in the same period (5454 children), using national data registry. Data analysis was conducted from January 1991 to December 2021.

Main Outcomes and Measures 
Prenatal detection and postnatal prevalence of major CHDs and rate of TOPs in a setting with a centralized health care system over 31 years.

Results 
A total of 3 300 068 children were born alive during the study period. Major CHD was diagnosed in 3827 fetuses, of whom 1646 (43.0%) were born, 2069 (54.1%) resulted in TOP, and 112 (2.9%) died prenatally. The prenatal detection rate increased from 6.2% in 1991 to 82.8% in 2021 (P < .001). Termination of pregnancy decreased from 70% in 1991 to 43% (P < .001) in 2021. Of 627 fetuses diagnosed in the first trimester (introduced in 2007), 460 were terminated (73.3%). Since 2007, of 2066 fetuses diagnosed in the second trimester, 880 (42.6%) were terminated, resulting in an odds ratio of 3.6 (95% CI, 2.8-4.6; P < .001) for TOP in the first trimester compared with the second trimester. Postnatal prevalence of major CHDs declined from 0.21% to 0.14% (P < .001). The total incidence (combining prenatal detection of terminated fetuses with postnatal prevalence) of major CHD remained at 0.23% during the study period.

Conclusions and Relevance 
In this cross-sectional study, the total incidence of major CHD did not change significantly during the 31-year study period. The prenatal detection of major CHD approached 83% in the current era. Postnatal prevalence of major CHD decreased significantly due to early TOPs and intrauterine deaths. The introduction of first trimester screening resulted in a higher termination rate in the first trimester but did not revert the overall decreasing trend of termination for CHDs in general.

Introduction

Congenital heart defects (CHDs) are the most frequent congenital developmental anomalies, affecting from 0.6% to 2.2% of live-born children depending on the demographics and the study period.1-3 The birth prevalence of CHD shows variation, raising questions about time trends in CHD incidence.4,5 The occurrence of major CHD in children is affected by several variables. Since the introduction of fetal ultrasound scans and biochemical marker assessment, postnatal incidence has been informed by various approaches to prenatal screening worldwide, ranging from limited to well-organized fetal screening programs, leading to different detection rates of CHDs.6,7 Some studies have demonstrated that ethnicity, lower maternal education, worse access to health insurance, and lower socioeconomic status are associated with lower prenatal detection rates within the same delimited area.8,9 Several studies have confirmed gradual increases in the fetal detection rate, but only a few were designed as nationwide studies.10-12 Prenatal diagnosis may provide parents with the choice of termination of pregnancy (TOP) based on the expected outcome of severe CHD learned of during fetal counselling.13,14 High rates of TOP combined with fetal demise reduce the number of babies born alive with CHDs and make it difficult to determine the true CHD incidence.15 In our previous study following the implementation of regional first trimester screening in the Czech Republic, we found a significant association between a fetal cardiac screening program and postnatal outcomes due to a high detection rate of severe forms of CHD and significant comorbidities, resulting in an increased TOP rate in the first trimester.16 In this study, we aim to evaluate whether the increased TOP rate in the first trimester is associated with the rate of TOPs with major CHDs in nationwide prenatal screening.

Study Design and Participants

A total of 3 300 068 children were born alive in the Czech Republic (population 10.7 million) between 1991 and 2021. During the 31-year study period, a total of 3827 fetuses with antenatally diagnosed major CHD were prospectively evaluated with known outcomes and associated comorbidities. Prenatal and postnatal prevalence of CHD in an unselected population was assessed by comparison with a retrospective analysis of all children born alive with major CHDs in the same period (5454 children), using national data registry. This study was a registry research study and was approved by the institutional review board of the University Hospital Motol. Informed consent was waived, as the data analysis was performed retrospectively and anonymously from compulsory enrollment to the National Fetal Database of CHD. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline.

Prenatal Study Group

In the Czech Republic, the prenatal screening program includes 2 ultrasound scans covered by the basic national health insurance, during the 1st trimester (11th-14th week of gestation) and the 2nd trimester (18th-22nd week), and biochemical screening (PAPP-A and free ß-HCG in the first trimester; HCG, AFP, and uE3 in the second trimester). The first trimester screening with basic heart anatomy assessment was introduced in 2007.17 Both screenings include examination of 4-chamber view and outflow tracts; identification of visceroatrial situs, systemic, and pulmonary venous connections; 3-vessel and trachea view; and sagittal views of the aortic and ductal arches. Use of color flow Doppler in routine screening was encouraged. Pregnancies referred by fetal medicine specialists and those classified as high risk for CHD according to international guidelines18 were referred to local prenatal cardiologist for further review to eliminate false positives.19

Pregnancies suspected of CHDs were referred to 2 specialized centers for completion of final diagnosis and family counseling. All fetal cardiac diagnoses were confirmed in newborns or postmortem in deceased children or fetuses (compulsory by law). All patient data were stored in the National Fetal Database of CHD administered by the National Health Information System since its foundation in 1981. It is compulsory for all parties involved in prenatal screening or specialized fetal assessment to contribute to the National Fetal Database of CHD, thus limiting any loss of data.

Postnatal Study Group

Every child born with suspected heart disease is examined by local pediatric cardiologists or neonatologists trained in cardiology. If major CHD is suspected, the child is referred to the single heart center for further evaluation and treatment. Numbers of CHDs were derived from the heart center database and verified by the National Health Information System registry on screening in the Czech Republic.20 A comparison of prenatal and postnatal incidence of CHD was considered reliable due to the national organization of health care, minimal migration, and the low neonatal mortality rate.

Definition of Diagnosis

Cardiac and extracardiac malformations were classified using the World Heath Organization International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10). Major CHDs were defined as malformations of the heart and great arteries that usually necessitate intervention within the first year of life.19 All fetal and postnatal CHD diagnoses were classified and listed in groups according to the most important lesions, as follows21: (1) tricuspid atresia, (2) mitral atresia, (3) double inlet ventricle, (4) congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries, (5) hypoplastic left heart syndrome, (6) persistent truncus arteriosus, (7) transposition of the great arteries, (8) interrupted aortic arch, (9) atrioventricular septal defect, (10) double outlet right ventricle, (11) coarctation of the aorta, (12) absent pulmonary valve syndrome, (13) Ebstein anomaly, (14) pulmonary atresia, (15) tetralogy of Fallot, and (16) total anomalous pulmonary venous connection.

Statistical Analysis

Total incidence was calculated as the number of major CHDs detected after birth plus the number of terminated pregnancies with major CHDs divided by the total number of live-born children plus pregnancies terminated in utero after 12 completed weeks of gestation. Detection rates were calculated as the number of prenatally detected fetuses with a major CHD divided by the number of live-born children with a major CHD plus fetuses with major CHD dying in utero and terminated pregnancies with major CHD, presented as percentages. We calculated 95% CIs for overall incidence rate estimates using an exact binomial test procedure.

As the annual data for some rare CHDs can be sparse and detection rates based on annual data can vary significantly, we used 5-year moving rates. Data in both the numerator and the denominator were summed over a 5-year period. In the figures, such results were plotted at the upper end point of the 5-year interval.

Gradual changes in total incidence, the prenatal detection rate, and postnatal prevalence as well as incidences and detection rates of individual CHDs were assessed using linear regression models. In the text, P values correspond to the t test for the regression coefficient.

The association of noncardiac anomalies with the decision to terminate the pregnancy after prenatal CHD diagnosis was explored using Fisher exact test and odds ratio (OR) calculated as odds of TOP in cases with a noncardiac anomaly divided by those without anomalies. All differences in frequencies between groups of patients were tested by the Fisher exact test. P < .05 was considered significant. All analyses were performed using statistical language and environment R version 4.1.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing).

CHD Prevalence

From 1991 to 2021, a total of 3 300 068 children were born alive, and 51 812 patients were examined in a single heart center with the diagnosis of a heart anomaly. Major CHDs were diagnosed in 5454 children. Postnatal prevalence of major CHD declined from a maximum of 2.02 per 1000 live-born children in 1995 to 1.35 per 1000 live-born children in 2021, a mean decline of 0.03 cases per 1000 live-born children per year (P < .001) (Figure 1).

CHD was observed in 5625 fetuses, of whom 3827 were diagnosed with a major heart defect and 1798 with less severe heart anomalies. Less important CHDs, such as aortic and pulmonary stenosis, atrial and ventricular septal defects and vascular rings, although some required surgery at an early age, were not included in the study due to variable prenatal and postnatal natural history. Of the 3827 fetuses with major CHDs, 1646 (43.0%) were born, 2069 (54.1%) were terminated, and 112 (2.9%) died in utero. The average detected prenatal incidence of CHD was 1.11 per 1000 live-born children, increasing from 1.30 per 1000 live-born children in 1991 to 1.78 per 1000 live-born children in 2021, representing a growth of 0.058 cases per 1000 live-born children per year (P < .001) (Figure 1). The gestational age declined from 23 weeks in 1991 to 16 weeks in 2021 (P < .001), with median (range) detection at 18 (11-41) weeks.

Total incidence of CHD was 2.3 (95% CI, 2.28-2.39) per 1000 live-born children, with a very slight decline of −0.0034 cases per 1000 live-born children per year (P = .32) (Figure 1). The incidence of individual heart lesions is summarized in Figure 2 and in eFigure 1 and eFigure 2 in Supplement 1. There was a significant decrease in postnatal prevalence of heart lesions with the most complex CHDs such as tricuspid atresia, mitral atresia, double inlet ventricle, hypoplastic left heart syndrome, persistent truncus arteriosus, atrioventricular septal defect, pulmonary atresia, tetralogy of Fallot, congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries, and double outlet right ventricle.

Detection Rates

During the 31-year interval, 50.1% of major CHDs were detected prenatally, increasing from 6.2% in 1991 to 82.9% in 2021 (P < .001) (eFigure 3 in Supplement 1). Detection rates of specific major CHDs appeared to progress during the study period. Detection rates of univentricular heart lesions (mitral atresia, tricuspid atresia, double inlet ventricle, hypoplastic left heart syndrome) varied between 71% and 100%. Initially low detection rates of coarctation of the aorta and transposition of the great arteries increased to 50% and 70%, respectively, in the last years (Figure 3). Detection rates of other specific major CHDs appear in eFigure 4 and eFigure 5 in Supplement 1.

An associated anomaly (chromosomal and structural) was found in 1113 of 3827 fetuses (29.1%) with major CHD. Chromosomal anomalies were detected in 811 (21.2%) and structural in 562 (14.7%). The most common chromosomal anomalies were trisomy 21 (269 of 811 [33.2%]), trisomy 18 (220 [27.1%]), deletions (182 [19.5%]), and Turner syndrome (98 [12.1%]). Most frequent noncardiac anomalies were detected among fetuses with atrioventricular septal defect (439 of 781 [56.2%), interrupted aortic arch (22 of 42[52.4%]), double outlet right ventricle (158 of 394 [40.1%]), persistent truncus arteriosus (56 of 146 [38.4%]), and tetralogy of Fallot (82 of 299 [27.4%]).

Pregnancy Outcomes

During the study period, 54.1% (95% CI, 52.2%-59.6%) of fetuses major CHDs resulted in TOPs based on the parent’s informed decision. The proportion of TOP decreased from 70% in 1992 to 43% in 2021 (P < .001). High termination rates were documented in fetuses with univentricular heart morphology (hypoplastic left heart syndrome, 500 of 583 [85.7%]; tricuspid atresia, 125 of 153 [80.1%]; double inlet ventricle, 124 of 179 [69.3%]; mitral atresia, 46 of 73 [63.0%]) and in CHD associated with a large proportion of noncardiac anomalies (persistent truncus arteriosus, 109 of 146 [74.6%]; atrioventricular septal defect, 529 of 781 [67.7%]; interrupted aortic arch, 28 of 42 [66.6%]; double outlet right ventricle, 239 of 394 [60.1%]). Additional noncardiac anomalies were associated with TOP in all cases with CHDs; the strongest of which was observed in heart lesions with otherwise usually favorable prognoses (ie, tetralogy of Fallot, coarctation of the aorta, atrioventricular septal defect, and transposition of the great arteries) (Table). The total number of TOPs for fetuses with univentricular heart morphology remained unchanged (0.10 cases per 1000 live-born children per year; P = .63) and the number of TOPs associated with noncardiac anomalies increased during the study period (0.51 cases per 1000 live-born children per year; P = .006). On the contrary, the rate of TOP for fetuses with isolated heart defects allowing for biventricular repair dropped from 61% in 1992 to an absolute minimum of 1% to 3% (P < .001) in the present time (Figure 4).

First Trimester Screening Outcomes

Since the introduction of the first trimester cardiac screening in 2007, the proportion of diagnosed CHDs in the first trimester increased from 7.1% to 26.7% in 2013 (P < .001) and remained constant in subsequent years. Associated anomalies were identified 9.5 (95% CI, 7.5-11.9) times more often in first trimester diagnosis (401 of 627 [64.0%]) vs the second trimester (383 of 2066 [18.5%]) (P < .001). A single ventricle morphology was diagnosed more frequently in the first trimester (288 of 627 [46.0%]) than in the second trimester (386 of 2066 [18.7%]; OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.9-4.5; P < .001). Of 627 fetuses diagnosed in the first trimester, 30 (4.8%) died prenatally and 455 (72.6%) were terminated. Of 2066 fetuses diagnosed in the second trimester, 37 (1.8%) died and 833 (40.3%) were terminated, resulting in an odds ratio of 3.6 (95% CI, 2.8-4.6; P < .001) for TOP when comparing the first and the second trimester. An increasing number of associated noncardiac anomalies was identified during the first trimester screening (eFigure 6 in Supplement 1).

Discussion

Total Incidence and Prenatal and Postnatal CHD Prevalence

To our knowledge, this is the largest nationwide study of the association of the prenatal cardiac screening with postnatal outcomes in children born with CHDs. These prenatal prospective and postnatal retrospective analyses in the setting of centralized health care, national data registry, and compulsory postmortem assessment demonstrated an increasing prenatal detection rate of major CHDs and those associated with additional comorbidities. We found that the overall incidence of major CHDs did not change significantly during the study period and that the estimated total incidence of major CHDs of 2.3 per 1000 live-born children per year corresponded to the data from the previous study conducted by Šamánek et al1 in part of the Czech Republic during 1980 to 1990. Similar data were published in studies from Denmark and Norway.10,15 Other studies, particularly from Asia, have suggested that increased CHD incidence could be caused by increased environmental pollution and/or genetically due to higher consanguinity.14,15 Continuing improvements in postnatal detection may also be a factor,4 alongside higher proportion of genetic disorders associated with CHDs.11

An increase in total incidence was observed in several CHDs. The increasing incidence of atrioventricular septal defect and coarctation of the aorta could be explained by higher prenatal detection of fetuses that would not naturally survive childbirth, mainly due to associated extracardiac abnormalities rather than due to isolated heart failure.22

CHD prenatal detection rates and specifically those of major CHDs have increased dramatically over time, and high detection rates are consistent with similar recent reports.10,21,23 The change in expertise, ultrasonography equipment, and increased training of fetal specialists have contributed to improved fetal detection. However, the main improvement of prenatal detection rates was achieved by involving pediatric cardiologists specialized in fetal cardiac scanning in the screening program.12 Some studies differ in the method of detection rate determination. Quatermain et al24 used the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery database of children from 91 participating centers across the United States undergoing operations at younger than 6 months of life and analyzed the overall rate and spectrum of prenatally diagnosed heart lesions. The study showed an increasing detection rate, namely from 26% in 2006 to 42% in 2012.24 Similar methods were used in other studies comparing the number of prenatally detected heart defects with those known postnatally from a national patient registry.10,15,19

First Trimester Cardiac Screening Program Implementation and Postnatal Outcomes

In our previous study following the implementation of regional first trimester screening in the Czech Republic, we found a significant association of fetal cardiac screening program with postnatal outcomes due to high detection rate of severe forms of CHDs and significant comorbidities, resulting in an increased TOP rate in the first trimester.16 The number of early terminations with single-ventricle morphology or those with noncardiac anomalies remained high; however, the rate of TOP for all other lesions significantly declined to 43% in 2021. Similar termination rates were documented in other studies (Lytzen et al,10 39.1%; Khoshnood et al,25 41%), with examples of even higher rates (Galindo et al,26 61%).

However, the assumption that reduced numbers of children are born with CHDs due to early terminations remains speculative and ethically controversial. Our study suggests that it may rather be the result of increased detection of serious, particularly genetic, disorders identified in the first trimester followed by early termination without diagnosed CHDs. It could also be explained by increasing age of pregnant women (≥35 years); difficulties conceiving naturally, resulting in more in vitro pregnancies; and greater confidence in improving outcomes among children with CHDs.6,27

It has been well recognized that the primary diagnostic information about CHD given to parents plays an important role in their decision-making.28 That is why we have repeatedly urged gynecologists and fetal medicine specialists to closely collaborate with fetal cardiologists who are responsible for providing a definitive description of the cardiac anatomy and function and offering the family expert opinions on natural history, treatment options, and long-term postnatal outcomes. This course of action, along with ensuing optimism of improved outcomes, may also have influenced the parents’ decision.

Terminations due to fetal genetic conditions may occur even in pregnancies with negative combined screening and thus possibly without detection of CHDs.29 Prenatal detection rates still vary among major cardiac anomalies, ranging from 25% in total anomalous pulmonary venous connection to 97% in hypoplastic left heart syndrome in this study. Similar data were reported in the literature with detection rates up to 100% in cases with univentricular heart.10 We have observed a gradual increase in the detection of heart lesions with outflow tract anomalies, most likely due to improvement of screening by implementing the 3-vessel and trachea view.30,31 Fetal diagnoses of coarctation of the aorta and transposition of the great arteries have a significant impact on postnatal outcomes, but the diagnosis remains challenging.24,32,33 However, in our study, the detection rates of these defects increased in recent years following the implementation of the 3-vessel and trachea view according to the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology guidelines.34

We recorded an overall decrease in the postnatal incidence of CHDs due to a high proportion of early terminations. Analogous changes in the proportion of CHDs have been described in other studies.6,10,13,15

First Trimester Cardiac Screening Program Risks and Benefits

It was suggested by Persico et al35 that the vast majority of major CHDs can be detected during the first trimester fetal ultrasound scan if the scan is performed by experienced fetal sonographers. However, in our nationwide study, the first trimester screening, performed by likely less trained gynecologists, could identify only 27% of all prenatally detected major CHDs. The first trimester diagnosis of CHD showed high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of any cardiac anomaly but poor predictive value of lesion’s severity due to the natural progression of some types of defects over time.36 This emphasizes the role of experienced fetal specialists in avoiding incorrect conclusions based on inappropriate diagnosis or its severity, such as the problematic differential diagnosis of small left ventricle in isolated coarctation of the aorta vs hypoplastic left heart syndrome.

Limitations

Despite the low neonatal mortality rate (in the last years of the study, <0.15% as documented by The National Health Information System20), it is not possible to rule out all postnatally deceased children with unrecognized CHDs. According to the Czech National Statistical Information System,37 migration is minimal, but it can still affect the accuracy of the data.

Conclusions

In this cross-sectional study, the total incidence of major CHD did not change significantly during the 31-year study period. Nationwide prenatal detection of major CHD exceeded 80% in the current era. TOP in the case of major CHDs has decreased from 70% in 1991 to 43% in 2021 but remains high in fetuses with univentricular heart and those with major CHD–associated comorbidities. The introduction of first trimester screening resulted in a higher TOP rate at early stages but did not revert the overall decreasing trend in TOP. In cardiac anomalies with favorable outcomes, the TOP rate decreased significantly, becoming rather exceptional in recent years.

Accepted for Publication: August 9, 2023.

Published: September 15, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.34069

Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2023 Tomek V et al. JAMA Network Open.

Corresponding Author: Viktor Tomek, MD, PhD, Children’s Heart Centre, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Motol University Hospital, V Úvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, the Czech Republic ([email protected]).

Author Contributions: Drs Tomek and Jičínská had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Tomek, Jičínská, Vlašín, Janoušek, Marek.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Tomek, Jičínská, Pavlíček, Kovanda, Jehlička, Klásková, Mrázek, Čutka, Smetanová, Břešťák, Vlašín, Pavlíková, Chaloupecký, Janoušek.

Drafting of the manuscript: Tomek, Jičínská, Pavlíček, Jehlička, Mrázek, Vlašín, Janoušek.

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Tomek, Jičínská, Kovanda, Klásková, Čutka, Smetanová, Břešťák, Pavlíková, Chaloupecký, Janoušek, Marek.

Statistical analysis: Tomek, Čutka, Pavlíková, Chaloupecký, Janoušek.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Jičínská, Jehlička, Vlašín.

Supervision: Janoušek, Marek.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by the project of the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic for conceptual development of research organization 00064203 (University Hospital Motol, Prague).

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 2.

Additional Contributions: We are grateful for and appreciate the contribution of regional cardiologists and obstetricians involved in the fetal screening program.

References

1.

Samánek
 M, Vorísková
 M.  Congenital heart disease among 815,569 children born between 1980 and 1990 and their 15-year survival: a prospective Bohemia survival study.   Pediatr Cardiol. 1999;20(6):411-417. doi:10.1007/s002469900502PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.

Liu
 Y, Chen
 S, Zühlke
 L,
 et al.  Global birth prevalence of congenital heart defects 1970-2017: updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 260 studies.   Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48(2):455-463. doi:10.1093/ije/dyz009PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.

Buskens
 E, Steyerberg
 EW, Hess
 J, Wladimiroff
 JW, Grobbee
 DE.  Routine prenatal screening for congenital heart disease: what can be expected? a decision-analytic approach.   Am J Public Health. 1997;87(6):962-967. doi:10.2105/AJPH.87.6.962PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.

Krishnan
 A, Jacobs
 MB, Morris
 SA,
 et al; Fetal Heart Society.  Impact of socioeconomic status, race and ethnicity, and geography on prenatal detection of hypoplastic left heart syndrome and transposition of the great arteries.   Circulation. 2021;143(21):2049-2060. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.053062PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.

Peiris
 V, Singh
 TP, Tworetzky
 W, Chong
 EC, Gauvreau
 K, Brown
 DW.  Association of socioeconomic position and medical insurance with fetal diagnosis of critical congenital heart disease.   Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2(4):354-360. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.802868PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.

Lytzen
 R, Vejlstrup
 N, Bjerre
 J,
 et al.  Live-born major congenital heart disease in Denmark: incidence, detection rate, and termination of pregnancy rate from 1996 to 2013.   JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3(9):829-837. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.2009PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.

Mai
 CT, Isenburg
 JL, Canfield
 MA,
 et al; National Birth Defects Prevention Network.  National population-based estimates for major birth defects, 2010-2014.   Birth Defects Res. 2019;111(18):1420-1435. doi:10.1002/bdr2.1589PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.

Marek
 J, Tomek
 V, Skovránek
 J, Povysilová
 V, Samánek
 M.  Prenatal ultrasound screening of congenital heart disease in an unselected national population: a 21-year experience.   Heart. 2011;97(2):124-130. doi:10.1136/hrt.2010.206623PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.

Blakeley
 C, Smith
 DM, Johnstone
 ED, Wittkowski
 A.  Parental decision-making following a prenatal diagnosis that is lethal, life-limiting, or has long term implications for the future child and family: a meta-synthesis of qualitative literature.   BMC Med Ethics. 2019;20(1):56. doi:10.1186/s12910-019-0393-7PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.

Tegnander
 E, Williams
 W, Johansen
 OJ, Blaas
 HG, Eik-Nes
 SH.  Prenatal detection of heart defects in a non-selected population of 30,149 fetuses–detection rates and outcome.   Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27(3):252-265. doi:10.1002/uog.2710PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.

Jicinska
 H, Vlasin
 P, Jicinsky
 M,
 et al.  Does first-trimester screening modify the natural history of congenital heart disease? analysis of outcome of regional cardiac screening at 2 different time periods.   Circulation. 2017;135(11):1045-1055. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020864PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.

Calda
 P, Sípek
 A, Gregor
 V.  Gradual implementation of first trimester screening in a population with a prior screening strategy: population based cohort study.   Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(8):1029-1033. doi:10.3109/00016349.2010.489599PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.

Donofrio
 MT, Moon-Grady
 AJ, Hornberger
 LK,
 et al; American Heart Association Adults With Congenital Heart Disease Joint Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young and Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing.  Diagnosis and treatment of fetal cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.   Circulation. 2014;129(21):2183-2242. doi:10.1161/01.Cir.0000437597.44550.5dPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.

Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic. Accessed August 18, 2023. https://www.uzis.cz/
23.

Jørgensen
 DE, Vejlstrup
 N, Jørgensen
 C,
 et al.  Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease in a low risk population undergoing first and second trimester screening.   Prenat Diagn. 2015;35(4):325-330. doi:10.1002/pd.4525PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.

Quartermain
 MD, Hill
 KD, Goldberg
 DJ,
 et al.  Prenatal diagnosis influences preoperative status in neonates with congenital heart disease: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database.   Pediatr Cardiol. 2019;40(3):489-496. doi:10.1007/s00246-018-1995-4PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.

Khoshnood
 B, Lelong
 N, Andrieu
 T,
 et al; EPICARD Study Group.  Assessing sociodemographic differences (or lack thereof) in prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects: a population-based study.   BMJ Open. 2016;6(3):e009353. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009353PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.

Galindo
 A, Herraiz
 I, Escribano
 D, Lora
 D, Melchor
 JC, de la Cruz
 J.  Prenatal detection of congenital heart defects: a survey on clinical practice in Spain.   Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011;29(4):287-295. doi:10.1159/000322519PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.

Rempel
 GR, Cender
 LM, Lynam
 MJ, Sandor
 GG, Farquharson
 D.  Parents’ perspectives on decision making after antenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease.   J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2004;33(1):64-70. doi:10.1177/0884217503261092PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.

Gardiner
 HM, Kovacevic
 A, van der Heijden
 LB,
 et al.  Prenatal screening for major congenital heart disease: assessing performance by combining national cardiac audit with maternity data.   Heart. 2014;100(5):375-382. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304640PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.

Escobar-Diaz
 MC, Freud
 LR, Bueno
 A,
 et al.  Prenatal diagnosis of transposition of the great arteries over a 20-year period: improved but imperfect.   Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(6):678-682. doi:10.1002/uog.14751PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.

Carvalho
 JS, Allan
 LD, Chaoui
 R,
 et al; International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.  ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart.   Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(3):348-359. doi:10.1002/uog.12403PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.

Persico
 N, Moratalla
 J, Lombardi
 CM, Zidere
 V, Allan
 L, Nicolaides
 KH.  Fetal echocardiography at 11-13 weeks by transabdominal high-frequency ultrasound.   Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37(3):296-301. doi:10.1002/uog.8934PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.

Zidere
 V, Bellsham-Revell
 H, Persico
 N, Allan
 LD.  Comparison of echocardiographic findings in fetuses at less than 15 weeks’ gestation with later cardiac evaluation.   Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(6):679-686. doi:10.1002/uog.12517PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *