Plaques in the brain are a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease, and the investigational drug aducanumab, which is now sold under the brand name aduhelm, has demonstrated some promise in this regard. Memory loss and cognitive decline are thought to be caused, at least in part, by these plaques, which are made of amyloid-beta protein. According to the findings of certain studies, the levels of these plaques in the brain can be lowered by treatment with aducanumab.
It is essential to keep in mind, however, that a reduction in the number of plaques does not always promise either an improvement in brain function or a halt in the advancement of the illness. In the clinical tests that have been carried out up until this point, the effectiveness of the medicine in enhancing cognitive capacities or halting the progression of Alzheimer’s disease has not been demonstrated in a way that can be considered definitive. In order to have a complete understanding of the possible advantages and hazards of Aducanumab as a therapy for Alzheimer’s, more study is required.
Although the preliminary research results are encouraging, it will be several more years before aducanumab may be utilized in a clinical setting as a potential therapy for Alzheimer’s disease. For the sake of determining its efficacy and safety, more research, including clinical tests conducted on a larger scale, is required.
What can cause Alzheimer’s disease?
Alzheimer’s disease, the specific origin of which is still unclear, has been linked to the production of amyloid-beta plaques in the brain, which can take place years before cognitive symptoms manifest themselves. However, the mere appearance of plaques is not sufficient evidence that memory issues exist, which adds another layer of complication to the condition. However, the majority of pharmacological research has been directed toward targeting these plaques in order to find possible remedies.
It’s possible that the Massachusetts-based business Biogen has made some headway in this area. In a clinical trial that lasted for 54 weeks, they gave varying dosages of their medication aducanumab to 125 patients who were in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease. The infusions were given intravenously on a monthly basis. Aducanumab is a monoclonal antibody, which means it is a molecule that was generated in the lab that resembles human immune system proteins. In addition, there were forty patients who were given placebo infusions as part of the trial.
Brain scans taken at the end of the research showed that individuals who had been given the medicine had much lower amounts of plaque in their brains compared to when the study had first begun. The highest dose produced results that were almost identical to plaque removal. Patients who were given a placebo, on the other hand, had few alterations in the brain plaques they had.
Plaque and Alzheimer’s
Additionally, the decrease in plaques that was identified in the research may have been a factor in the slower progression of Alzheimer’s symptoms. According to Roger M. Nitsch, MD, co-author of the study and head of the Institute for Regenerative Medicine at the University of Zurich, patients who received the antibody had more stable cognitive abilities than those who received the placebo. Cognitive questionnaires were employed to measure the participants’ cognitive ability, even though the purpose of the study was not to establish the efficacy of the treatment being investigated.
The executive director of the Banner Alzheimer’s Institute in Phoenix, Eric M. Reiman, MD, believes that this discovery is of great relevance. Dr. Reiman, who was not involved in the research but wrote a commentary that accompanied the research and was published in the journal Nature, described the findings as “unusually striking” and supportive of the theory that plaque plays a role in the development of Alzheimer’s symptoms. The opinion was published with the research.
According to Dr. Reiman, this might represent a substantial step in the battle against Alzheimer’s disease if the first cognitive findings are validated in bigger and more comprehensive clinical trials, which are already under way. These trials are currently being conducted. However, he emphasizes that even while the new cognitive findings are intriguing, it is important to remember that they are not conclusive. Before reaching any definitive conclusions on the effectiveness of aducanumab and other treatments of a similar kind in treating symptoms such as memory loss, the whole cognitive benefit of aducanumab and other drugs of this kind has to be evaluated in the bigger trial.
The Clinical Trial
The findings of Biogen’s study were derived from a phase 1b clinical trial, which is an early stage of research that only involved a limited number of human participants. These preliminary investigations have shown some encouraging findings; nevertheless, more extensive phase II and phase III clinical trials are required to validate the drug’s safety and efficacy, as well as to get regulatory permission for its usage by the general public. Some of the people who took part in the experiment ended up dropping out because they were suffering from headaches and a buildup of fluid in their brains. The authors of the study recognise the significance of taking into account the possibility of adverse consequences.
It is essential to keep in mind that a significant number of Alzheimer’s medications that have showed promise in earlier phases of development have eventually shown to be unsuccessful in subsequent tests. The antibody known as aducanumab is presently the subject of additional research in the form of two ongoing clinical studies with a total participant pool of roughly 2,700 people. Although these early findings represent an essential first step, Dr. Nitsch is optimistic that they will pave the way for more substantial advancements in the future.
This opinion is echoed by Dr. Reisman, who also underlines the importance of conducting more study to determine whether or not a plaque-reducing medicine can successfully reduce the progression of cognitive impairment. He feels that such confirmation would be a revolutionary step forward in comprehending Alzheimer’s disease as well as in the treatment of it and the prevention of it.